DeepSeek Chat V3.1 Dominates Crypto Market with 35% Return in Three Days
  • Home
  • AI
  • DeepSeek Chat V3.1 Dominates Crypto Market with 35% Return in Three Days
By Hamza Ahmed profile image Hamza Ahmed
2 min read

DeepSeek Chat V3.1 Dominates Crypto Market with 35% Return in Three Days

In a live trading challenge, DeepSeek Chat V3.1 outperformed all AI and Bitcoin models, growing by $35%$ in just three days. Learn about the winning strategy and failures of other competitors.

A new benchmarking platform, Alpha Arena, tested six leading artificial intelligence (AI) models in autonomous cryptocurrency trading in real perpetual markets on Hyperliquid.

The experiment assigned each model $10,000 in real capital and a single, identical system prompt, then let them operate without any human intervention.

The initial results after just three days were astounding. DeepSeek Chat V3.1 saw its portfolio grow by over 35%, reaching a total value of $13,502.62.

Not only did he outperform all other AI traders, but he also beat Bitcoin's benchmark "Buy & Hold" which gained only $4%. Grok 4 ranked second with a return of $30%$, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 made $28%$.

Profit Generated By AI Models: Source Alpha Arena

The experiment, running until 3 November 2025, aimed to assess the risk management, timing and decision-making ability of the LLM in live market conditions.

DeepSeek's Winning Strategy

DeepSeek triumphed due to a combination of factors:

  1. Position Diversification and Management: Maintained long positions on all six planned assets (ETH, SOL, XRP, BTC, DOGE and BNB) with moderate leverage ($10x-20x$), maximising exposure to the altcoin rally that occurred on 19-20 October.
  2. Strict Discipline: Unlike others, DeepSeek consistently adhered to the "Non-hit invalidation → HOLD" rule, allowing profits to compound without overtrading.
  3. Balanced Risk Management:No single asset dominated the total returns of $2,719, a sign of solid risk allocation.

The Errors of the Competitors

Not all AIs were successful. Gemini 2.5 Pro suffered the biggest loss, a $-33%, due to a costly mistake: opening a short on BNB in a growing market. GPT-5 also struggled, losing $27%$ due to 'operational errors' such as not setting stop-losses.

Qwen3 Max, on the other hand, was far too conservative, trading only BTC and closing at $-0.25%$.

The Alpha Arena organisers stress that the results are purely for educational purposes, but DeepSeek's $35%$ gain in just 72 hours is a powerful sign of the intersection of AI and finance.

Whoever wishes to replicate a similar approach to learning can do so safely using testnet or paper-trading platforms, adopting the same minimalist prompt to focus on discipline and risk management.

By Hamza Ahmed profile image Hamza Ahmed
Updated on
AI Crypto Trading
Consent Preferences

Crypto Nations: The Battle for Money, Power, and Code

Documentary on Bitcoin, blockchain and global geopolitics.