DeepSeek Chat V3.1 Dominates Crypto Market with 35% Return in Three Days
  • Home
  • AI
  • DeepSeek Chat V3.1 Dominates Crypto Market with 35% Return in Three Days
By Hamza Ahmed profile image Hamza Ahmed
2 min read

DeepSeek Chat V3.1 Dominates Crypto Market with 35% Return in Three Days

In a live trading challenge, DeepSeek Chat V3.1 outperformed all AI and Bitcoin models, growing by $35%$ in just three days. Learn about the winning strategy and failures of other competitors.

A new benchmarking platform, Alpha Arena, tested six leading artificial intelligence (AI) models in autonomous cryptocurrency trading in real perpetual markets on Hyperliquid.

The experiment assigned each model $10,000 in real capital and a single, identical system prompt, then let them operate without any human intervention.

The initial results after just three days were astounding. DeepSeek Chat V3.1 saw its portfolio grow by over 35%, reaching a total value of $13,502.62.

Not only did he outperform all other AI traders, but he also beat Bitcoin's benchmark "Buy & Hold" which gained only $4%. Grok 4 ranked second with a return of $30%$, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 made $28%$.

Profit Generated By AI Models: Source Alpha Arena

The experiment, running until 3 November 2025, aimed to assess the risk management, timing and decision-making ability of the LLM in live market conditions.

DeepSeek's Winning Strategy

DeepSeek triumphed due to a combination of factors:

  1. Position Diversification and Management: Maintained long positions on all six planned assets (ETH, SOL, XRP, BTC, DOGE and BNB) with moderate leverage ($10x-20x$), maximising exposure to the altcoin rally that occurred on 19-20 October.
  2. Strict Discipline: Unlike others, DeepSeek consistently adhered to the "Non-hit invalidation → HOLD" rule, allowing profits to compound without overtrading.
  3. Balanced Risk Management:No single asset dominated the total returns of $2,719, a sign of solid risk allocation.

The Errors of the Competitors

Not all AIs were successful. Gemini 2.5 Pro suffered the biggest loss, a $-33%, due to a costly mistake: opening a short on BNB in a growing market. GPT-5 also struggled, losing $27%$ due to 'operational errors' such as not setting stop-losses.

Qwen3 Max, on the other hand, was far too conservative, trading only BTC and closing at $-0.25%$.

The Alpha Arena organisers stress that the results are purely for educational purposes, but DeepSeek's $35%$ gain in just 72 hours is a powerful sign of the intersection of AI and finance.

Whoever wishes to replicate a similar approach to learning can do so safely using testnet or paper-trading platforms, adopting the same minimalist prompt to focus on discipline and risk management.

By Hamza Ahmed profile image Hamza Ahmed
Updated on
AI Crypto Trading
Consent Preferences

How Michael Saylor Transformed Cash into Bitcoin Billions

From MIT to MicroStrategy CEO—why he moved corporate cash into Bitcoin and shifted Wall Street.

Subscribe