Coinbase Challenges the Irs on Tax Privacy
Coinbase challenges the IRS at the US Supreme Court to defend the privacy of crypto contributors, opening a crucial debate on digital privacy.
Coinbase challenges the IRS at the US Supreme Court to defend the privacy of crypto contributors, opening a crucial debate on digital privacy.

Get the latest news, learn from experts, discover new tools, and find inspiration right in your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A powerful documentary on how Bitcoin and blockchain are reshaping money, power, and geopolitics—from El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment and Europe’s regulatory revolution to the rise of decentralized finance and the new global financial order.
Before backing a taxpayer fighting with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) over the agency's access to its digital asset platform data, US cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase petitioned the US Supreme Court.
In a case filed with the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) on 30 April, Coinbase's lawyers argued that the First Circuit Court of Appeals ruling sets a 'dangerous precedent' for cryptocurrency users, potentially allowing the government to 'track every cryptocurrency transaction made in the past and monitor every future transaction'.
James Harper, a Coinbase user who sued the IRS after the exchange was forced in 2017 to provide transaction data to authorities via a broad "John Doe" subpoena, filed the appeal with the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Evaluates A Historic Case On Digital Privacy Supported By Coinbase And Industry
A petition in favor of a plaintiff filed by a party not directly involved is called a amicus brief. The Court's decision could set important precedents regarding bitcoin users' digital privacy rights and the IRS's ability to collect tax data. Harper's motion was denied by both the US District Court for the District of New Hampshire and the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, leaving the Supreme Court as the last resort.
In a 30 April post on X, Paul Grewal, Chief Legal Officer of Coinbase, said:
"We believe in tax compliance, but this case goes far beyond a circumscribed individual request and far beyond cryptocurrency. It concerns emails, banks, phone companies, internet providers and everything else. The same privacy rights that apply to the email you receive should also apply to your email account."
It is uncertain whether the Court will accept the case. Supreme Court decisions are generally made public in June. Numerous industry players, such as the DeFi Education Fund and social networking giant X, have filed similar papers in support of Harper since the first appeal was filed in 2020.
The Coinbase petition to the US Supreme Court represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over tax privacy in the digital age. By challenging the IRS's extensive data collection practices, the case could set a precedent that affects not only cryptocurrency users but also the digital privacy of all Americans.
While the Court considers whether to accept the case, its decision could redefine how government agencies access personal data through third-party platforms. Backed by industry leaders and privacy advocates, this challenge highlights growing concerns about how to balance tax collection with constitutional rights in an increasingly digital and decentralised world.
Read Next
YouTube integrates PayPal's PYUSD to pay US creators
YouTube introduces PayPal's PYUSD as an optional payment method for eligible creators in the US, opening up stablecoins in mainstream monetisation streams.
Bitcoin disengages from equities: historical correlation broken
Bitcoin breaks historic correlation with equities: markets rally as BTC falls for the first time since 2014.
Garantex: Russian Exchange Under Sanctions Moving Millions Under Track
The Russian exchange Garantex is back in operation despite sanctions and seizures, moving millions through mixing, cross-chain and state stablecoin.
Light Penalty for the 40 Billion Collapse: Why Do Kwon took Less than SBF
The US federal judiciary has issued conflicting sentences in the most egregious crypto cases. Prosecutorial conduct has weighed more heavily than economic loss in the disparity of punishment between Do Kwon and SBF.