Redundancies at Indeed and Glassdoor: HR at Change
Indeed and Glassdoor lay off 1300 people. HR transformation accelerates in 2025.

Get the latest news, learn from experts, discover new tools, and find inspiration right in your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A powerful documentary on how Bitcoin and blockchain are reshaping money, power, and geopolitics—from El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment and Europe’s regulatory revolution to the rise of decentralized finance and the new global financial order.
In July 2025, it emerged that the large Japanese group Recruit Holdings, owner of the online job search platforms Indeed and Glassdoor, has initiated a new wave of large-scale redundancies. The decision will affect about 1,300 employees, or about 6 per cent of the total staff in the company's HR department.
The layoffs will mainly take place in the United States, where the key divisions of both brands are concentrated, but will also involve other countries. In particular, technical teams, product development departments, and HR and sustainability departments will be affected.
Reasons for layoffs and new strategic orientation
According to official management statements, the main objective of the restructuring is to unify Indeed and Glassdoor's structures to increase efficiency and reduce duplicated functions. This will speed up the implementation of new solutions, revise the management model and restructure the business in a more compact and flexible way.
The company representatives emphasise that the changes underway are not just a response to external challenges, but part of a long-term strategy. The emphasis is on increasing the speed of digital product releases, reducing internal costs and overhauling the organisation of work.
Changes in management
In addition to changes among ordinary employees, there have also been changes at the top. The managing director of Glassdoor will leave the company, as the brand will be de facto integrated into Indeed's structure. The head of sustainable development will also leave his post, replaced by a new top manager from head office.
The merger of the two main recruiting services under a single management allows the company to consolidate resources and reduce operating costs, which is crucial in a context of increasing competition from more automated and customised recruitment platforms.
Context and consequences
This represents the third major wave of redundancies for Recruit in the last two years. Already in 2023 and 2024, the company had cut more than 3,000 employees. Management justified these decisions with the adaptation to new market conditions and the desire to adopt a more sustainable business model.
The news provoked mixed reactions within the company. Many employees expressed their disappointment on social media, pointing out that they had to leave the team despite their achievements and participation in major projects. Some said they were concerned about the speed with which priorities change, even in companies hitherto considered to be among the most stable employers.
A signal for the entire industry
For the recruitment industry, these events represent an alarming but consistent signal: the world of work is changing rapidly and companies are forced to choose between traditional models and more technological and flexible approaches. However, behind the numbers of reports and presentations, there are people who have to face a professional reconversion in an ever-changing environment.
Indeed and Glassdoor were symbols of the digital revolution in the world of work. Now they are undergoing a transformation - perhaps one of the greatest in their history.
Read Next
Wall Street between AI and Santa Claus Rally: risk or opportunity
Wall Street is torn between the seasonal year-end rally and doubts about the sustainability of investments in artificial intelligence, while Bitcoin and risk assets show signs of weakness.
YouTube integrates PayPal's PYUSD to pay US creators
YouTube introduces PayPal's PYUSD as an optional payment method for eligible creators in the US, opening up stablecoins in mainstream monetisation streams.
Light Penalty for the 40 Billion Collapse: Why Do Kwon took Less than SBF
The US federal judiciary has issued conflicting sentences in the most egregious crypto cases. Prosecutorial conduct has weighed more heavily than economic loss in the disparity of punishment between Do Kwon and SBF.
LUNA soars 55% pending Do Kwon ruling
LUNA is up 55% in 24 hours thanks to the network upgrade and the wait for the Do Kwon ruling, while the market remains divided over the rally.