Crypto UK Regulation: Growth And Consumer Protection
The UK plans new crypto regulations to support the Web3 and protect consumers, in collaboration with the US.
The UK plans new crypto regulations to support the Web3 and protect consumers, in collaboration with the US.

Get the latest news, learn from experts, discover new tools, and find inspiration right in your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A powerful documentary on how Bitcoin and blockchain are reshaping money, power, and geopolitics—from El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment and Europe’s regulatory revolution to the rise of decentralized finance and the new global financial order.
The UK aims to develop its digital asset sector by promoting the growth of the domestic Web3, along with greater consumer protection, through a modernisation of cryptocurrency regulations.
The US regulatory counterparts will work closely on this initiative through meetings involving Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
The UK Will Have A New Crypto Policy
The crypto community has expressed doubts about the plans published by the UK Treasury for possible regulatory changes. The Treasury shows an unwavering commitment to eradicating illegal activities related to digital assets, which generates scepticism towards its proposals. The UK continues to support a regulated approach to cryptocurrency, unlike the US, which appears to be easing restrictions instead.
In a global context of evolving crypto regulations, the US is showing a proactive approach to interacting with the industry. The SEC has launched a Crypto Task Force for direct dialogues with business leaders, while developing a comprehensive regulatory framework for stablecoins, which is considered a top priority.
Focus On UK-US Regulatory Alignment
The UK adopts similar principles of international cooperation as the US in its current regulatory approach. Reeves held a meeting with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to discuss various issues, including the creation of a cross-border regulatory sandbox, supported by several crypto industry leaders. The UK and US governments announced the imminent creation of a financial regulatory working group, with the shared goal of aligning policies.
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, supported this initiative stating:
Fundamental Differences In Approach
Fundamental differences in the messages conveyed emerge. US regulators show a growing preference for targeted approaches rather than general crackdowns, while the UK Treasury continues to emphasise its commitment against malicious actors. The UK government wants to develop the sector through balanced regulation, while avoiding a completely laissez-faire approach.
The concerns of the crypto community stem from previous experiences. The UK crypto sector has received criticism for its strict regulations, which have led several companies to move their operations abroad. The UK's reputation for strict regulation could become an obstacle to the development goals of Web3.
It is still too early to make firm predictions on the evolution of crypto regulation in the UK. By July, the government will publish an operational plan to update regulation, creating a timeline to adapt policies, especially in collaboration with the US. The coming months will be crucial to understand how the UK's digital asset strategy will develop and what effects it will have.
Read Next
UK recognises digital assets as property
The UK passes a landmark law recognising digital assets as a new form of ownership, with impacts on security, bankruptcy and financial markets.
HashKey aims for $215m in Hong Kong IPO, targets institutional capital
HashKey opens IPO subscriptions in Hong Kong, seeking $215 million ahead of its 17 December stock market debut.
Japan: high taxes curb crypto investments
In Japan, the main obstacle to the growth of the crypto market is not volatility, but taxes and tax complexity that discourage investors.
South Korea: mandatory liability for crypto exchanges
South Korea introduces strict liability for exchanges after the $28 million hack on Upbit: damages without proof of negligence.